While declaring a “national energy crisis” in Nepal, our government green signaled a plan to develop a 200 MW thermal plant. Generating power eight hours a day for 240 days in a year, the plant will incur a yearly loss of more than Rs 5 billion (which too will be borne by the government). To top it off, the government will provide a grant of Rs 9.6 billion to the party that decides to install the thermal plant (source).

This development will supposedly provide a reprieve from the constant power cuts; they are so frequent that we cherish the hours when we do have electricity, rather than complain on the hours when we don’t.

Amidst an ailing Republic, we are desperate for need of energy as an indication of stability. The “thirty five point plan” that has taken shape is perhaps a quick and dirty bail out option compared to a sturdier and sustainable plan. Investments of a reported Rs 9.6 billion and more, into a technology which has received condemnation because of its connections with climate change and others, by a government strapped for funds, does seem rather unusual. Green signaling the plan against advice from energy experts and the operating institution (Nepal Electricity Authority) themselves, does question the motive. Are there any kickbacks involved?

We are still reeling from the recent fuel crisis; how such plant/s will function if and when such crises repeat is perhaps one dimension, planners failed to consider. Other developments that are questionable in line with this development, include shoving off the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) requirements for hydro power projects envisioned within a year, for less stringent measures – Initial Environment Examination (IEE).

Why have environmentalists remained mum on this? Is it in fear of a backlash from an irate energy stripped population, or is it because they dare not be sidelined as bickering hooligans that seem to take to the streets at the drop of a hatch?

We are supposedly a country that boasts of water resources second only to Brazil and yet we resort to thermal power plants. Perhaps this is so because at this juncture, energy security is more dearer than a blue skyline or birds and bees.

Update @ 25 November, 2008: As of today, the load shedding hours have been bumped up, from ten hours that we have had for a couple of weeks to 12-14 hours a day as of today. So much for a reprieve from the load shedding hours.
humph!!


4 Comments

IT Freak · December 27, 2008 at 11:31 pm

I think this is the right time that you’ve posted this article. There is definitely energy crisis in nepal, but is it really a real one or an artificial crisis created by the big money players for their commission?

IT Freak · December 27, 2008 at 5:46 pm

I think this is the right time that you’ve posted this article. There is definitely energy crisis in nepal, but is it really a real one or an artificial crisis created by the big money players for their commission?

anjesh · December 29, 2008 at 10:13 pm

Who cares (or better has time to care) about country or its people.. let alone environment..
Is there any other alternative when the government is criminal… i don’t think so…

anjesh · December 29, 2008 at 4:28 pm

Who cares (or better has time to care) about country or its people.. let alone environment.. Is there any other alternative when the government is criminal… i don’t think so…

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *